Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Corporate Law Update 12 June 2020
    2020-06-12

    In this week’s update: the test for an LLP member to bring a derivative claim, updated guidance on company meetings, the court sanctions a takeover despite not all beneficial owners being able to vote on the scheme and a few other items.

    Covid-19 is affecting the way people conduct their business, retain their staff, engage with clients, comply with regulations and the list goes on. Read our thoughts on these issues and many others on our dedicated Covid-19 page.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Public, Macfarlanes LLP, Limited liability partnership, Annual general meeting, Coronavirus, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), European Commission, UK House of Commons, London Stock Exchange, Companies House, Financial Reporting Council, House of Lords, Companies Act 2006 (UK)
    Authors:
    Robert Boyle , Dominic Sedghi
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Macfarlanes LLP
    Challenger banks: risks and rewards for new entrants
    2016-09-14

    This article was first published on the Practical Law website and in the PLC Magazine in June 2016.

    Challenger banks, which are set up to compete with the larger traditional banks, have seen rapid growth in the wake of increased openness to change in the banking sector and a desire for more consumer choice. Their clever targeting of niche markets is opening up plenty of scope for growth. While this opportunity does not come without difficulties, the rewards for challenger banks that succeed can be considerable.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, White Collar Crime, Gowling WLG, Regulatory compliance, Prudential Regulatory Authority (UK), Capital requirement, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), London Stock Exchange, Basel III, Consumer Credit Act 1974 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Banking Act 2009 (UK), Chancellor of the Exchequer
    Authors:
    Kam Dhillon , Richard Ellis
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days